Agenda and presentations

Main highllights and Actions

Follow up from Bergen

There were a few topics discussed in Bergen where we could benefit from a closer collaboration:

Assurance has been identified as a feature that all Nordic federations value - Zacharias noted that assurance for example might be something we can work on even at a distance before meeting in January, if people agree. Bo noted that

how to use NORDUnet could represent the Nordic T&I interests in international activities

Wallets are another area of interest, and I understand we could start with this in 2025 when things are more mature 

eduGAIN baseline: work is currently ongoing to define the baseline based on the edUGAIN Futures WG recommendations - it would be good to share information on the progresses

It was noted that the meeting in Bergen offered a good opportunity to get to know each other. And it was agreed to follow up with another f2F meeting, better spread over 2 half days. Licia to send a doodle with dates.

EOSC EU NODE updates

Licia summarises that work on going in the EU node: 

Related to the EOSC EU and worth noting:

Hildegunn noted that Feide releases faculty as that is one of the mandatory attributes. She noted that as  all institutions need to open up for services in the customer portal it is often difficult to find the right services via eduGAIN. At the time of the meeting, the EU NODE may not be visible for users in Norway as they were not able to find it.  Christos noted that in this case they would not be able to find the EU NODE in the list because it is connected the a proxy AAI. The service to release attributes to is MyAccessID.

Christos also noted that the legal bases for MyAccessID is controller-to-controller. Work is in the pipeline to make MyAccessID more transparent to provide more information on what users will have access via MyAccessID. It is important to dissociate contractual aspects from the identity management flows; however it is important to talk about these things so everybody understand how things work.

Shib consortium updates and some thoughts on the next steps for the SwamID federation

SUNET and CSC use Shibboleth as the ID Federation software. Pål noted that Shib SP software will change. Currently based on old language, will not stay as it is. Shib consortium need to handle libraries by itself and this is not viable by itself. The new software will be based on profile of identity providers and of course it will need to support OIDC. Pål added that:

Pål noted that SAML has a limited life ahead, will not change anymore, will be as it is, and that all federation operators need to look at alternatives sooner rather than later.  OASIS does not have any active work in SAML anymore. We all need to move along. Hildegunn said that still more than 40% of the traffic is SAML traffic. Christos said that all the new SPs are not using SAML anymore, it's all OIDC and OAuth2.

What will the future bring?  Pål feels that indeed we should move on and there are some interesting things happening right now:

Marina added that:

Zacharias encouraged people to look at https://refeds.org/a/2984  - "Is There a Future for REFEDS and R&E Federations?"- One interesting sentence:

"What is clear is that we need to have a conversation about this—sooner rather than later. The landscape of identity is changing rapidly, and if we don’t adapt, we risk being left behind."

And features that are highly requested by federations is to start using SeamlessAccess:

The service showcase of the updates:

https://use.thiss.io/ 

Upcoming events